Ralix's game Reviews on Newgrounds

[Turtles G4M3]

I have mixed feelings about this game.
On one hand, it seems somewhat childish: bright colours, smiling clouds, cheerful sound loop, giant font, handwritten text in background, typos, emoticons nearly everywhere…
On the other, it does show some potential: most of all the last sequence with the burning houses and broken city, also the diversity of minigames (the included Pong game is quite neat easter egg), and your sense of humour is also a plus.

However, you need to ask yourself, what is the true content of your game? If everything was gone and only one thing should stay, what would you want it to be? And once you answer that, add more of it in the game.
So far, the game is mostly about slow walking (or "sliding", since there is actually no walking nor jumping animation). Outside of house → house → computer → bus → riding the bus → outside the city → the city → a shop → YOUR ACTUAL MISSION and before you even realise it, you are back to walking. Imagine it as a movie or book – would you watch a movie that consists mainly of walking somewhere?
"Exploring" is fine, but even in exploring you have to put some gameplay, not just static images (e.g. opening drawers and finding something funny/interesting inside, new set of clothes you can wear in the wardrobe, "fishing" in water – any kind of interaction with the environment, really).

And the actual missions should be way longer. They are probably meant to be the core of your game, yet just when I though "yay, platforms!", I reached the end. You also don't have to put advice everywhere. Sometimes it's useful ("Click to continue"), but sometimes unnecessary ("Jump", "Try not to fall", "Don't use calculator").
As I said above, I liked how the city changed in the end. There are games which include repetition (= going to the city here), so you get used to something and then it turns upside down. That's good. Meaningless repetition should however be avoided.

There's quite some space for improvement here, but it is a good start for making a pretty neat game.

Oh, and I just noticed that you're fourteen, so it's actually pretty great you managed to start and complete a project of this size. Hopefully what I said above will help you to improve.
Good luck with this or anything you decide to make in the future.

[Comics + Games = ?]

Now, that's a cool, original game!
At first, I was afraid it would lack some sort of deeper interactivity and will be simply a "slow reading mode", but fortunately, that wasn't a case and the later stages shown that this has great potential.

I know this is a test, but if you decide to develop this further, it'd be thrilling to see more complex changes you could make. So far it's about creating a path to the other side, but usually with one small adjustment – what about combining more stuff? You could even allow more solutions to continue further (e.g. (1) get two lovers to meet, but they break up in the end (passable though), unless you go back (2) and give the guy flowers – thus creating "good" and "bad" solution). It even creates an opportunity for some sort of "time-travel".

Anyway, from the choice and diversity of the levels in this "test" it looks like you have a lot of ideas of your own; so – this is an amazing idea, please make more. :)

[Suprema]

Are the controls Z M K L on purpose to make it harder?
I might be slightly biased with QWERTZ keyboard, but I can imagine even QWERTY users wouldn't be too happy with these controls. It was quite hard to finish even the first level.
Why don't you simply use WASD or arrow keys?

ivane5 responds:

Apparently I was quite biased by my personal experience, now I'm reconsidering my assumptions.

I'll issue and update with different possible input setups(WASD included).

Thanks for feedback! :)

--

Added new key schemes

[Ignis mortis]

It looks very good. Just some things:

– The movement speed could be slightly faster. All the characters look like they are "slowly running" when you move
– If you jump in an opposite direction (e.g. face right, jump, hold left arrow), the sprite doesn't change to reflect that (= you still face right)
– Jumping on lava tiles kills you, OK, but jumping on platforms elevated from lava which look safe harms you as well (which means insta-kill for the archer)
– More ways to regain health would be neat. There's the priestess, but I only found one and it was quite complicated to reach her
– I was really thrilled when I found out the "zombies" can climb. Great job on that!
– If you run out of lives, you are instantly taken to the menu without even seeing the "You're dead" message. AND (!) if you start a new game then, you die instantly with your NEW character and appear at a checkpoint from you previous playthrough

But most important of all; I think the game could really use some sort of hinting where you need to go. We've got the map, which is fine, but it shows all the stuff you will eventually need to collect and with the world as open and vast as it is, you can wander in +- six directions, each of which forking into more paths.
I started the game three times and didn't even find the water shoes. Yet I wandered through many different environments, found three items I couldn't reach yet, killed plenty of enemies (which didn't cause a trouble) and eventually got killed by lava or acid (which caused a lot of trouble) when I reached a dead end.
You don't have to point out a specific glowing X on the map, but you could add some more natural obstacles in the directions that shouldn't be explored yet (for example a "lake" which requires the blue shoes) – early, not after you go the wrong way all the way up/down.

Overall, I am glad I tried out the game. It has really neat graphics and animations, three different playable characters which is always a plus, and it can keep you entertained for quite a while; so my biggest complaint here is probably the navigation.

[Click Farm]

82 farmers with 123 tractors, silos and barns to harvest 6×6 farming patch? Well, WHY NOT! :)

I just feel there was too large gap between "Helper" ($25,000) and "Mansion" ($1,000,000), so I began to lose interest when I was around 100k and needed 900k more to buy the next item in list.
In general, it was way easier to gather clicks than gold - perhaps something that enhances gold income would be good, so the gold/click values would stay more or less even. Or faster level-ups, so you can afford the more advanced crops.

But it's good to see you try something new. It was a neat game.

selfdefiant responds:

Thanks! It's tricky balancing everything out!

[Riddle Transfer 2]

A great ending to a wonderful series.
I have always adored your sense of humour. It shows in all your games (Esotericism of Bargo :D) but I always felt we see most of it in Riddle School – and now we finally got a worthy closure to the story.
Good luck with whatever you decide to create in the future. I believe it will be just as amazing. ;)

[city jump]

In these jump precision games it is always helpful to see where your feet are, so you can time your jumps better. Half the times I fell here it was because I jumped too early/too late in attempt to jump from an edge.
Also, because you always need to jump while holding Shift, it might make more sense to make sprinting enabled by default.
Good luck with the game.

[Robo Jump]

Good start, but it could use some polishing.
For example; please disable screen scrolling with arrow keys, because it makes your game really user unfriendly – the screen goes up with the up arrow and I had to scroll back down constantly. Try something like this:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8916620/disable-arrow-key-scrolling-in-users-browser
Or simply use WASD instead of arrow keys.
Then, the score counter is black, but so is the background – you can't read the numbers.
And your character has a black border, which is visible when you fall through the "green box".

In the current state, your game can be entertaining for a while, but it needs more work.

[Pong Simulator 2016]

Before I say anything else – I really adore the television look. Some care must have been put there to make the screen and paddle movement curvy and I like it.

Furthermore, well, it's Pong, it's simple, so I don't have any remarks here, but the main downside of this game is probably the absence of computer AI. If there was some kind of switch to make computer control one of the players, it would be great. There are some tips how to do that for example here:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/23960654/unity-pong-ai-movement-speed
http://forum.unity3d.com/threads/scripting-ai-for-2d-pong-game.229226/
Just don't forget to make the computer somehow beatable (e.g. slow paddle speed).

Good luck!