Ralix's game Reviews on Newgrounds

[mini knight game]

I think it's a quite fun game, well done.
I like the art, the movement feels fluent, the jump distance and gravity feel just about right.

Yet overall, the game isn't terribly long – if you didn't always have to start from the very beginning, you could breeze through in two minutes. There aren't many game mechanics in play either, the danger consists solely of pits and spikes – although that is “sufficient” when the game is as long as it is.
I like the fluent transition when you walk between rooms; it looks great.

As for possible improvements:
– Sounds or music. If a game has neither, it usually feels a bit incomplete. Don't underestimate the effect a few chiptunes played when jumping or dying can have on the game's enjoyability.
– If you make the game any longer in the future, I'd seriously consider adding checkpoints. Repeating the same intro room for the 100th time just because you died to something seven rooms ahead will soon start to test your patience.
– You start the game by jumping into a pit which is an odd choice considering you spend the entire game avoiding falling into pits.
– I'm not a fan of the screen wipe after death; especially since it's top to bottom, so it takes an entire second until you're able to see where you're going after you respawn. I died way too many times by walking into the first pit while the screen wipe was still halfway through the screen.
– There are some tricks to make platformers more enjoyable, here I'd look specifically into the so-called “coyote-jumping”, i.e. be able to jump even a tiny bit after you leave the solid ground: https://youtu.be/vFsJIrm2btU?t=70
Here you have the opposite, and when I stand firmly on the very edge of a platform, I can no longer jump, which makes the controls seem unresponsive sometimes.
– You should probably prevent the player from walking back beyond the left screen edge. It can (and will) kill you off-screen.
– “You won” screen message is fine, but might seem a bit lazy. You completed the game; it's an achievement, so show the player something nice. Like the knight walking up the stairs out of the dungeon to broad daylight, finding a treasure, saving a princess… anything, really.
Here, you can still die even after you win because there is a spike on the side of the screen.

Don't get me wrong, I still think it's a pretty good game, but there are definitely a few ways to bring the quality up a notch without having to make major adjustments to the gameplay.

ReallyDumbNut responds:

thankyou so much, it is one of my first games. but still I am for sure going to use these tips. thankyou so much for taking the time to type this out.

[Edd Clicker!]

It's a bit simplistic way to do a clicker.

The graphics and the theme is nice, but there's no end goal, no reason to go past the initial score. Usually, you would have rewards and unlockable secrets in exchange for a high score, not merely ways to increase the score increments. There's no scoreboard either, so you're really only challenging yourself to see a large number, and that's it.

The clicking itself doesn't offer anything special either – the click hotspot doesn't change, the gameplay doesn't change, so there's no harm in simply starting an auto clicker and letting the score pile up while you don't have to pay any attention at all.
And if you do, you'll have very soon seen everything the game has to offer.

[Gedaria]

It's an ambitious, aesthetically pleasing and charming little indie game, no doubt. However, it's still a bit clunky and (at least here) quite buggy.

I tried a couple of times to get past the supervisor. Sometimes he gets stuck at the right side of the screen (so you have to commit suicide to try again), when I finally beat him and got the letter, I saw no way to progress further (both sides of the screen were blocked, the boss is still playing his defence animation and the letter didn't disappear).
I hope it's not intentional (i.e. “you finished the demo” after two screens of gameplay). If it is, it should definitely end with a message telling you as such, perhaps with a link to your Steam page.
I would check the browser console here; it has a pretty long list of warnings with resources it failed to load.

Overall I wish the controls would be more responsive. This is most visible when you press 'Space' to defend, and still get hit because the animation didn't progress enough yet. I'd rather have the boss telegraph his attack, and then hit quickly (which you can also deflect quickly) – so you don't have to figure out at which part of the animation should you hit space.

Other notes:
– the leaf health bar is really creative
– I'm instinctively drawn to use the tip of the leaf as the cursor hotspot, but it's actually its top, which is a bit weird
– The resolution on Newgrounds is *massive*, so you have to zoom out quite a bit. How about a fullscreen mode? (Or perhaps you tried that, and it didn't let you in the way you do it:
“Failed to execute 'requestFullscreen' on 'Element': API can only be initiated by a user gesture.”)
– It's nice that you support a lot of languages
– The gameplay shown in the menu is a cool idea (but I think at one point you show the edge of the area with no background)
– The branch in the boss fight respawns in front of and dialogue and the letter text
– I think there should be an animation for jumping
– I wouldn't say dráb = supervisor; see https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/dr%C3%A1b

Hodně štěstí. Zatím jsem vám dal wishlist. :)

GeorgeBooP responds:

Greeting from team Gedaria!

Thank you for your kind reply and suggestions. First of all the game was primarilly meant for PC as downloadable exe file. Then I remembered this beautiful page. I said to myself I must publish the game here aswell!

So I have just downloaded one addon to the game engine, exported for HTML5 and hoped it'll run. Heheh, so yeah there might be some bugs.

Second the "field level" isn't the only level in this "DEMO" there are three levels in total. The other two are much larger. I honestly don't know why you weren't able to progress further. I have to look at it!

Once again thank and take care, Viktor Zwinger
from team Gedaria

[Mr Boon (48 hours game)]

This is really, really pretty. The transition effects when you move up and down are spectacular.
However, after you catch, cook and eat three fish, you realize that's all there is to it. There's no goal, no risk or danger, no change in gameplay.
So it's a wonderful interactive art piece, perfect for the theme Duality, but as a game, its core gameplay loop lacks something more.

[Twin Bodies]

When I saw the starting screen, I thought it will be a simplistic, procedurally-generated endless arcade game, but I couldn't be further from the truth.
Every (increasingly difficult) challenge you face on your way up is about something different, often with new gameplay mechanics that keep surprising you. I think you really squeezed the maximum out of the idea; well done.

[Perpendicular Monkey]

I must say, for a two-day game jam entry, this is an incredibly well-made game! Fun, visually polished, with music and animations; everything.

Maybe the only drawback is that the game is too short (naturally). Just when you feel you got past the introductory levels and you're playing the main part of the game, it ends; even though you were hoping to see more of the challenging puzzles, perhaps with new gameplay elements later on.

But even so, it's still a pretty fun and high-quality game even if I didn't know it was made in two days.

Biebras responds:

Thank you for your feedback!!! We added new levels!

[Red Path]

I think you might be onto something here. The core idea and gameplay loop is pretty fun, but whoa, it can be so frustrating sometimes. It feels like a great prototype (makes sense since it comes from a game jam), but to make it genuinely enjoyable, it would require some polish (visual, too).

While playing the game, sooner or later you're going to realize the key to victory is overusing slow motion. Since you can't stay still, slow motion can give you the time necessary to look around, think and properly aim – and if you no longer deal any damage, you can just let go for a moment and immediately start slow motion again. Other than that, there are no penalties, so there's no reason *not* to use it.
But I think the game is more enjoyable when you at least start aiming and shooting outside of slow motion and only resort to it when necessary.

And for the love of God, please leave the camera alone. Perhaps it's a collision bug (I hope it's not intentional), but sometimes when you jump near the red line, the camera instantly snaps to a different angle which botches your jumps and makes you lose nine out of ten times. Another reason why it's a good idea to enter the slow-motion hallway through your jump.

Some other suggestions:
– I wouldn't damage the player *immediately* when you pause – rather in bursts, starting e.g. one second after standing still. So you can still turn around or start aiming without having to do it in slow-mo.
– To prevent overuse, perhaps the slow-motion mode should be a depletable bar that you can recharge by successfully shooting enemies – BUT then you'd have to make the rest of the game a bit easier to make up for it.
– Maybe the red path would look better semi-transparent (so that it doesn't block your view)
– You shouldn't see the red path under you if you're falling directly down
– Slow health regeneration? So making a small mistake isn't a burden for the rest of the level, sometimes forcing you to restart.
– I have a lot of "MOUSE_MODE_CAPTURED" errors in the console

By the way, with Godot, you could even add medals (in-game achievements) or scoreboards to prolong the life of your game (more people would play, and also return to unlock medals they missed): https://www.newgrounds.io/get-started/
It's also a nice metric to see how many people got to various stages of the game. I can't imagine a huge portion of players actually completed the game.

Personally, for now, I gave up in the Tightrope level because I realized what stunt I'd have to pull off to return to the starting point (after finishing the rest of the level, even), and it would take a lot of very frustrating attempts. Although it's a pity I didn't reach any of the bosses you mention, because those would no doubt be interesting, too.

But I see the potential there; it could be a great game if you work on it further – something like a new Superhot.

TrollHunterX responds:

Thanks for the feedback.
I've put the cheat codes in the description, if you want to see the rest.

[Pongfy]

As far as Pong games go, this is fairly simplistic. There's no AI to speak of, the opponent simply moves in a set pattern – so you don't need to be clever to win, just patient.

A new ball being thrown in happens too quick so you might not have time to catch it; also sometimes it bounces fully vertically or horizontally for a while until it shoots elsewhere at a wildly different angle (which is good so you don't get stuck, but bad because the change is so big that it's unexpected).

Finally, the high score isn't that great of a feature because you are only competing with yourself, but have to enter the name every time – which will only be useful if the same computer is used by multiple people.

So there's a lot of space for improvement, but it's not a bad game overall.