Ralix's game Reviews on Newgrounds

[Karate Battles]

This is definitely a big improvement over the first version.
Now it feels like an actual fight, and the opponent fights back. And there's a joke if you win.

What could use improvement now is probably input handling, so the controls feel more fluent and responsive. E.g. while holding an attack key, you are blocked from moving until you release it (there isn't a timeout or priorities etc.). I can stop mid-air by jumping and holding K, and wait there until I have an opportunity to kick the enemy who cannot hurt me up there.

But really, what a leap from the first version; well done!

DoubleItch responds:

Thanks!
I did try to fix those but with the method I'm using to code I don't think the way I was doing the coding in order to make that not happen wouldn't work, but I still accept the positive notes.
And I'm glad you enjoyed my game.

Oh there's also a bonus if the timer runs out. it can go 3 ways depending on the health

[I tried remaking Street Fighter 1]

It's a good start; the core mechanics are there, the animations and pixel art are stellar, but unfortunately, there's very little gameplay yet.

If you figure out the controls, you can easily win by repeating any single attack; the enemy makes no effort to engage in combat with you if you stay far, or react to your moves when you come close.
When the opponent collapses (and floats above the ground), he still has a bit of life left (not to mention he uses your name and icon). You can walk behind his body, but your feet still touch the ground in front of him, and you can briefly appear even lower partially beyond the bottom edge by performing certain moves while jumping.
The parallax effect is nice but slightly confusing because even though the perspective of the background *and* foreground changes, your character's doesn't, so it looks a bit weird.

I know you mention you're going to be updating this, and you're probably aware of most of the issues mentioned – but we should still be rating the current version, not the “potential” of the game.
Good luck with further development!

DoubleItch responds:

had to delete my previous reply so I could do it again, but I have sort of updated my game, although it was more like I changed it completely, but I promise it should work a lot better. here's a link. https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/882645

[Hungry Knight Demake]

It's a solid remake; nevertheless, it's pretty hard (it has a faster pace than the original) and occasionally a bit buggy. The Knight turns invisible in the map's lower part, making navigating difficult. Probably my most common cause of death was enemies spawning directly underneath me; so I think there should at least be a brief window after they spawn when they can't deal damage yet, so you can dash out of the way.

[MAZE-GENERATOR]

It's really not much…

First of all, it's not a “generator” (there's no random maze here that gets procedurally generated), it's more of a drawing tool on a 10×10 grid. Furthermore, you don't see it top-down but in perspective, so any maze would be relatively hard to design, especially since there are zero customization options. And if you manage to create a maze after all, there's no way to “play it”, export it, or share it with someone else. I would probably have a better experience designing a maze by coloring cells in an Excel sheet, and it would be a more flexible and portable solution.

Looking at it as a game doesn't add much more merit to either. It's definitely not a “puzzle platformer” as categorized. To its credit, there's a sound, a way to restart the maze, and what is there works without bugs; but it still feels like a game of Snake in which you have to move manually 1 tile at a time and can't win or lose.

I can see it as a base of something cool if you decided to build upon the idea, but as of now, I think most people will click around a couple of times, close the game and forget about it soon.

lucasoliveira1992 responds:

Arigato

[All the King's Men]

This is honestly a brilliant concept for a game. I was hoping the king himself would join the fray in the final level for absolute mayhem, but still, what a fun idea.

I think making the scoreboard “Level reached” is a strange choice because it puts everyone who completes the game on the same score. Perhaps “Fewest defeats on game completion” would be more varied?

Good luck in the game jam!

3p0ch responds:

Thanks, and good call about the scoreboard -- I've updated the NewGrounds version with a death counter.

[The Ruins Of Ishgar!]

I think the stylized graphics are super nice, and it's a well-made game overall, but if I were to focus purely on the gameplay, I'd definitely have some comments.

– Why does the screen shake so much? It genuinely almost made me dizzy until I got used to it.
Also, this is a game about precision, if the screen shakes, it increases the difficulty, but for the wrong reasons.
– “Collect the coins” – uh, there were coins?
– I wouldn't rotate the health bar. Usually in other games, even when your character moves, your health bar remains firmly horizontal. And since most things kill you either instantly, or after three hits at most, you could even do away with the health altogether, and show the damage on the ship itself (e.g. by adding cracks, smoke, or recolouring parts of the ship).

It's still a very lovely game to play for a bit, although after finishing the first level and going through a tight tunnel in the third level, I felt like I have seen everything, and nothing new was introduced in the remaining levels until it was over.
I'd consider adding a bit more challenge at least to the final level, something you haven't seen before – like rising lava, flying upwards, moving enemies; something like that.

[Bit Gunner]

Pretty well-made minigame, a pity it doesn't go any further.

– I like the little things that make playing the game feel good. The stretch on the gun when shooting, the sound effects, the clear contrasting colours. Love the sweating sprites when you lose health.
– There's no increase in difficulty, no new enemies, and hearts are plentiful, so you pretty much lose when you get bored
– How about a counter for enemies killed connected to a global scoreboard (https://www.newgrounds.io/​)? It could prolong the lifetime of the game.
– After you die, you have to click on the “Start” button twice to restart. It first begins to play music, and then the second click loads the game.
– You can't shoot from a corner.
– Occasionally, dying enemies have a weird animation.
– The enemies may spawn right under you which depletes your health bar rather quickly before you move out

A fun little game, no doubt, but there's currently no reason to play it longer than a few minutes.

TrIckyJack788 responds:

The new update is out, and almost all of these cons are now patched. I didn't put a global leaderboard system, but I did add something else ;)

[Froler Run]

I think the gap between the final points tier and the rest is so extreme that you have no reason to ever “play it safe and slow”.
Also, I wouldn't make the box fall immediately after the start, but rather after your first click (so that new players don't instantly lose until they figure out what's going on). And maybe consider awarding the points on “bounce”, not on touch – because currently, you will always get the minimum of 5006 points, even if you do absolutely nothing.

This kind of game makes you bored really fast unless there's some competitive element. I would at least keep track of the player's best score, so you at least compete with yourself – or much better, connect it to Newgrounds scoreboard so that people may compare scores with everyone else.
https://www.newgrounds.io/

NassimSoftware responds:

Thanks for the feedback. Didn't know about the API. Yeah my game definitely needs a lot of improvements.

UPDATE : I have integrated the newgrounds API to keep track of scores.

[Happy Piggy Farm]

I'd say it's a pretty cool game with quite an original premise.

Rather easy. You need to spot the two pigs that would become your “boundary”, eat a bit and then simply wait it out. That's true until the very last level, though, when the margin is small and you have to really pay attention.

There aren't too many levels altogether, so it's not that repetitive for the short while you're playing, but if this was a longer game, it would need to figure out how to keep the player moving (source of danger? hunger? varying apple sizes?), so you'll naturally lose weight or run into food by accident, so the whole level isn't based on calculating the average value and hitting the sweet spot.

But overall a good idea and a solid game.